Copyright © 2026 OyList. All Rights Reserved.
Share
Items19
1
Deliberative opinion poll
Texas utility deliberative polls, 1996 to 1998
A rare deliberative exercise with a physical legacy you can see on the horizon. Between 1996 and 1998, electric utilities in Texas ran deliberative polls managed by James Fishkin as part of the state's resource planning, asking random samples of customers to weigh energy choices after hearing the evidence. Those findings led to a higher renewable energy portfolio standard, and Texas ended up with a relatively high share of wind power compared with other states. It is the case to cite when someone claims deliberation never touches hard infrastructure or money.
More about Deliberative opinion poll2
Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (British Columbia)
Still the template most assemblies copy, and the most painful near miss. In 2004, 160 British Columbians, one man and one woman from each of the 79 electoral districts plus two Aboriginal members, spent most of the year learning electoral systems before choosing BC-STV, a local form of the single transferable vote, and voting 146 to 7 to put it to the public. In May 2005, 57.7 percent of voters said yes and majorities backed it in 77 of 79 districts, but the government had set a 60 percent threshold, so nothing changed. A second referendum in 2009 drew only 39.1 percent. A reminder that an assembly's legitimacy does not pass automatically to voters who never saw its work.
More about Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (British Columbia)3
Deliberative opinion poll
Zeguo township budget polls, China, mid-to-late 2000s
Evidence that deliberative polling is not only a tool for established democracies. In the coastal township of Zeguo, James Fishkin's team selected a representative sample of residents to weigh which public works projects should be funded. The exercise then grew beyond ranking projects into a process that helped determine the township's budget each year. It happened inside a one-party system, which limits how far the model travels, but it remains one of the clearest cases of random-sample deliberation shaping actual spending.
More about Deliberative opinion poll4
Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (Ontario)
British Columbia's sequel, with a starker result. Ontario drew 103 citizens at random in 2006, one from each provincial constituency, and their final report in May 2007 recommended mixed member proportional representation, a choice they made by 94 votes to 8. At the October 2007 referendum, 63 percent of voters chose to keep first past the post. The cabinet had also set a steep bar: 60 percent overall plus majorities in at least 64 of 107 districts, tougher than a legislative committee had proposed. Read it next to British Columbia to see how much depends on the public campaign that follows an assembly, not only on the quality of its report.
More about Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform (Ontario)5
Citizens' Initiative Review
A small, permanent device rather than a one-off event. Oregon created the first permanent Citizens' Initiative Review in 2010: roughly two dozen randomly selected voters spend a few days questioning advocates and experts about a ballot measure, then write a statement for the voters' pamphlet setting out the main arguments and how many panelists came down on each side. Voters found the statements helpful, and their knowledge of the measures rose. The weakness is money. Oregon has not funded it permanently, so it reviews only one measure in years when funding arrives. Colorado, Arizona, Massachusetts, Sion in Switzerland and Finland have run pilots.
More about Citizens' Initiative Review6
2010–2013 Icelandic constitutional reform
The people's constitution that parliament never passed. In November 2010, Iceland convened a National Forum of 950 randomly selected citizens to set out what a new constitution should hold. An elected Constitutional Assembly was meant to draft it, but the Supreme Court annulled that election in January 2011, and parliament appointed most of the winners to a Constitutional Council instead. In October 2012, 67 percent of voters approved using the council's text as the basis for a new constitution. The bill then failed to reach a vote before the 2013 election, partly because of opposition filibustering. Only the 2010 forum used random selection; the drafters were elected.
More about 2010–2013 Icelandic constitutional reform7
Constitutional Convention (Ireland)
Ireland's first experiment, and a hybrid worth understanding before praising the later assemblies. The Convention on the Constitution, which ran from 2013 to 2014, seated 66 randomly selected citizens alongside 33 politicians from the Oireachtas and the Northern Ireland Assembly, under an independent chair. Of its eight assigned topics, marriage equality had the biggest consequence: the government accepted the recommendation, and the May 2015 referendum passed with 62.1 percent. The government also accepted its call to remove the offense of blasphemy from the Constitution. Whether mixing politicians in helped legislators own the result, or diluted the citizens' voice, is still argued over.
More about Constitutional Convention (Ireland)8
Citizens' Assembly (Ireland)
The Eighth Amendment, 2016 to 2018
The assembly most often held up as proof the model works. Ninety-nine citizens and a chair, former Supreme Court judge Mary Laffoy, voted 79 to 12 that the constitutional ban on abortion should not be retained in full, and preferred to let the Oireachtas legislate. A parliamentary committee built on that work, and on May 25, 2018, 66.4 percent of voters approved repeal; the abortion law was signed that December. The same assembly's climate recommendations, each passed by at least 80 percent of members, fed a committee report the Dáil endorsed in May 2019, when it declared a climate and biodiversity emergency.
More about Citizens' Assembly (Ireland)9
Gdańsk
Citizens' assemblies, 2016 to 2017
The strongest evidence that city assemblies can deliver. After major flooding caused millions of euros of damage, Gdańsk convened the first citizens' assemblies in Poland, groups of around 56 or 57 residents, and proposals backed by more than 80 percent of members were enacted. Later assemblies took on air pollution, civic engagement and the treatment of LGBT people. A study of the Gdańsk assemblies found about 75 percent of recommendations made it into city policy, while judging that at least 11 percent were implemented for reasons other than the assembly. Nine more assemblies followed in seven other Polish municipalities.
More about Gdańsk10
Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission
Citizens' jury on nuclear waste, South Australia, 2016
A jury that told a government no and was heeded. After a royal commission recommended facilities for used nuclear fuel from several countries, South Australia's government put the idea to a citizens' jury of 350 people. In November 2016, two-thirds of them concluded a disposal facility should not be pursued under any circumstances. Premier Jay Weatherill responded that an absence of bipartisanship stood in the way of progress and that his government would not pursue a change to its policy, while promising a referendum and staying open to the question if community mood shifted. The clearest case here of deliberation stopping a project rather than starting one.
More about Nuclear Fuel Cycle Royal Commission11
Deliberative opinion poll
National deliberative poll on constitutional amendments, Mongolia, 2017
A rare case of a country writing deliberation into law as a step before amending its constitution. Under Mongolia's new Law on Deliberative Polling, a random national sample has to deliberate before parliament can proceed. On April 29 and 30, 2017, 669 of the 785 citizens invited spent a weekend in Ulaanbaatar weighing 18 proposals for constitutional change. Informed opinion moved sharply: support for a second parliamentary chamber fell from 61 to 30 percent, and for a single six-year presidential term from 61.5 to 41 percent, cooling two ideas that had looked popular before the weekend.
More about Deliberative opinion poll12
German-speaking Community of Belgium
Permanent Citizens' Dialogue, since 2019
Where most assemblies are one-offs, Belgium's small German-speaking Community made deliberation a standing institution in 2019. A permanent Citizens' Council, drawn from former assembly members, picks topics and convenes citizens' assemblies on them, and must be told in writing how their recommendations are being implemented. Six assemblies ran in its first five years. Its honest lesson is that permanence alone does not guarantee uptake: early recommendations were often judged too vague to turn into a law or decree, and the original pace of one to three assemblies a year strained staff, so the rules now provide for five per legislative term.
More about German-speaking Community of Belgium13
Citizens Convention for Climate
The boldest promise and the bitterest aftertaste. From October 2019, 150 French citizens drawn by lot worked out how to cut greenhouse gas emissions 40 percent from 1990 levels by 2030 in a spirit of social justice. By June 2020 they had approved 149 proposals, and the prime minister had said they would be submitted without filter. President Macron then set aside three, including a 4 percent tax on corporate dividends and a lower speed limit, and the Climate and Resilience bill that followed was estimated to contain about 40 percent of the convention's proposals. Members gave the government's handling an average of 3.3 out of 10. Required reading on what happens when expectations outrun commitments.
More about Citizens Convention for Climate14
UK Climate Assembly
Britain's national test run, led by the House of Commons rather than ministers. More than 100 people from all walks of life met over six weekends in spring 2020 to work out how the UK should reach its legally binding net zero target. Their final report, published on September 10, 2020, argued the path must be underpinned by education, choice, fairness and political consensus. Its influence is far harder to trace than Ireland's or France's, which makes it the useful comparison for anyone designing an assembly with no guaranteed response from the people who commissioned it.
More about UK Climate Assembly15
Citizens' Assembly (Ireland)
Gender equality, 2020 to 2021
The failure every assembly advocate should study. Chaired by Catherine Day, this assembly examined care, work and women's place in public life, and proposed constitutional wording that would oblige the state to take adequate measures to support care in the home and family. A parliamentary committee agreed, but the government drafted different amendments, which one legal scholar said would not have obliged the state to support carers at all. On March 8, 2024, voters rejected both: 67.7 percent against changing the definition of family and 73.9 percent against the care amendment, on 44.4 percent turnout. The assembly's own text never reached the ballot.
More about Citizens' Assembly (Ireland)16
Scotland's Climate Assembly
The case that tests a legal duty to answer. Scotland wrote this assembly into its climate law in 2019, and ministers had six months to respond to whatever it proposed. More than 100 members published 81 recommendations on June 23, 2021, and the Scottish Government replied to every one on December 16, 2021, saying its climate action was strongly aligned with them while acknowledging that some members would be disappointed it could not progress them all. When the assembly met again in February 2022, members said the government had failed to test how far its existing powers could go, and asked for annual check-ins and a scorecard of ten indicators. A guaranteed reply, it shows, is not the same as guaranteed action.
More about Scotland's Climate Assembly17
Citizens' Convention on the End of Life
The newest proof that an assembly can move a deeply divisive question, even when the route runs through years of parliamentary fight. Asked by the government how France should handle the end of life, 184 citizens drawn by lot deliberated, and in March 2023, 75.6 percent of those voting came out in favor of opening access to active assistance in dying, under conditions, a position their final conclusions restated in April. That position fed the parliamentary process that followed. On July 15, 2026, the National Assembly gave final approval to the law on the right to assisted dying by 291 votes to 241, and it was published in the official journal on August 19, 2026.
More about Citizens' Convention on the End of Life18
Citizens' Assembly (Ireland)
Drugs use, 2023 to 2024
What happens when an assembly runs ahead of the cabinet. Ninety-nine citizens, chaired by former health service chief Paul Reid, met over seven months and in January 2024 made 36 recommendations for a comprehensive health-led response to drug use rather than one run through the criminal justice system. A parliamentary committee set up to answer them went further: its June 2026 final report recommended decriminalizing possession of all drugs for personal use. The Taoiseach promised the report very serious consideration, while the justice minister urged caution about legal changes that could increase drug-taking. No decision to decriminalize has followed, so the assembly's influence is still being settled.
More about Citizens' Assembly (Ireland)19
Bundestag
Citizens' council on food policy, 2023 to 2024
The German parliament's own experiment with sortition, and a cautionary one. From late September 2023 to mid-January 2024, 160 participants chosen by lot worked on where food is a private matter and where it is the state's business, and in February 2024 they handed Bundestag President Bärbel Bas nine recommendations, led by a free, healthy lunch for every child in schools and day care. The Bundestag debated them in March 2024 and sent them to its agriculture committee. By November 2024, about 30 members had written to Bas that little had happened, warning that this would damage trust in the instrument and in democracy, a lesson for assemblies with no mechanism that forces a response.
More about Bundestag
