Copyright © 2026 OyList. All Rights Reserved.
Share
Items10
1
Wireless Philosophy
The best first stop if philosophy is new to you. Wireless Philosophy, or Wi-Phi, has university philosophers write the scripts and record the audio, then turns them into short animated explainers, so you hear the argument from someone who teaches it for a living without sitting through an hour-long lecture.
What makes it useful here is that it teaches the method rather than a set of conclusions: series on cognitive biases and critical thinking sit beside ones on utilitarianism, the problem of evil and the sizes of infinity. It is free, and nobody is selling you a worldview at the end.
More about Wireless Philosophy2
Jeffrey Kaplan
A philosophy professor at UNC Greensboro who went looking online for videos that would help people understand hard problems like Russell's paradox, then decided to make his own. By spring 2025 his roughly hundred videos had passed 25 million views, which is remarkable for material this careful.
Kaplan's gift is slowing a famous puzzle right down: he states the premises, shows where intuitions pull apart and lets you see exactly which step a critic would reject. Paradoxes are the highlight, with ethics and the philosophy of language close behind. Ideal if a textbook chapter has left you more confused than when you started.
More about Jeffrey Kaplan3
Philosophy Vibe
Philosophy Vibe explains fundamental arguments, influential theories and major philosophers through animated debates. The format suits this list better than it first appears: instead of one voice delivering a verdict, you hear a position and the objection to it in turn, which is how a good seminar discussion is supposed to work.
The animation is simple and the videos move quickly, so treat them as a way to get the shape of a debate before reading the original text, not as a substitute for it.
More about Philosophy Vibe4
Gregory B. Sadler
The channel to choose when you want to read a hard book alongside someone who will not skip anything. Sadler, a philosopher by training, built his Half Hour Hegel series as 25 to 35 minute videos that lead you through the whole of the Phenomenology of Spirit, passage by passage, without skipping any of the material.
That same close-reading habit runs through thousands of other videos on classic and contemporary philosophy, and he is still posting regularly. It is unglamorous, mostly one person talking through a text, but few channels do more to make you open the primary source yourself.
More about Gregory B. Sadler5
Michael Sugrue
Michael Sugrue's lectures were recorded for The Teaching Company's 1992 series Great Minds of the Western Intellectual Tradition, then found a vast new audience when his daughter uploaded them to YouTube during the Covid pandemic. His 42-minute lecture on Marcus Aurelius became the most popular of them.
Sugrue died in 2024, but his channel remains one of the best ways to hear the Western canon taught as a continuous conversation, each great thinker answering the ones before. Choose him for big-picture surveys delivered with real conviction, and pair him with a close-reading channel when you want to test the details.
More about Michael Sugrue6
Philosophy Overdose
An archive channel rather than a presenter: Philosophy Overdose gathers rare lectures, interviews and televised debates featuring famous philosophers, many of them decades old. It is the easiest place to find Bryan Magee's celebrated television conversations, where Magee draws a leading expert on each thinker into plain, patient discussion.
Its value here is hearing major figures make their own case, in their own words, and sometimes face a live opponent. Recent uploads include a 1972 exchange between Brand Blanshard and B. F. Skinner on consciousness and behaviourism.
More about Philosophy Overdose7
The Royal Institute of Philosophy
This channel carries the institute's London Lectures, weekly talks that bring philosophers from many fields to London, along with its archive of past events. Each season has a theme: the 2025 to 2026 centenary series, Philosophy in Retrospect and Prospect, included a lecture by Timothy Williamson, and the 2026 to 2027 season turns to children and philosophy.
Choose it to hear current academic philosophy argued by many voices rather than one. It makes a natural step up once introductory explainers start to feel thin.
More about The Royal Institute of Philosophy8
Closer to Truth (2000)
8.7/10on IMDb
First aired
The public television series created and hosted by Robert Lawrence Kuhn, whose YouTube channel holds full episodes and thousands of shorter interviews. Kuhn puts the same big question, about consciousness, the cosmos or the apparent fine-tuning of the universe, to several philosophers and philosophically minded scientists in turn, and lets each answer in their own words.
That structure is the point: one question, many considered answers that often contradict each other, with the host asking rather than ruling. Expect conversations rather than lectures, and a channel that is still adding new interviews.
More about Closer to Truth9
Majesty of Reason
Joe Schmid, a doctoral candidate in philosophy at Princeton, launched this channel in April 2020 with philosophy of religion at its centre and metaphysics, metaethics and epistemology alongside. For years a major strand was his careful criticism of arguments for God's existence, made from an agnostic position.
In August 2026 Schmid announced on the channel that he had returned to the Catholic Church, so its direction may shift. The back catalogue is still the place to watch a technical argument taken apart premise by premise, with the strongest version of each side on the table.
More about Majesty of Reason10
Then & Now
Lewis Waller's video essays on philosophy, history and politics look for genealogies in history and first principles in philosophy. Episodes such as his complete guide to Hegel on history, or his treatment of Foucault's History of Madness, trace where an idea came from before asking whether it holds up.
This is the slow, reading-heavy end of video essays: each one takes a long time to make, and it shows. Choose it when you want to understand a difficult thinker in context rather than collect a quick summary of their conclusions.
More about Then & Now
